Talk:Ho Chi Minh City/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 13:37, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * 1) File:Sfone logo.png - File:Vinaphone logo.png, and File:HoChiMinhCityFC.png need Non-free media use rationale for inclusion in this article
 * 2) One image is captioned Saigon Port should be Ho Chi Minh for consistancy
 * 3) There are way too many images at the end of the article
 * 4) Text squeezed betwen two images
 * 5) There is an almost total lack of references and should only be start class not B
 * 6) Bare url references used
 * 7) Wikipedia used as a reference
 * 8) Web references without access dates
 * 9) Ref 13 "Yearbook of the Encyclopedia Americana (2006)". p.175. needs adding to a bibliography

To allow work on the article which I do not believe can be completed in teh time I am quickfailing. Jim Sweeney (talk) 13:37, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

WP:CITESHORT Manual of Style