Talk:Hoko River Archeological Site

Paleontology
I note that this article includes a section on paleontology, with notes about Cheiragonidae family members. If these are the taxa discusses in the Schweitzer\Salva article then there should be some notation that the fossils are MUCH older then the archeological site being from the Eocene Hoko river formation. The paper lists the type locality for Montezumella eichhorni, the Cheiragonid referred to in the paper as being near west Kydikabbit, does this even fall in the Archeological Site? --Kevmin (talk) 03:06, 29 March 2009 (UTC)