Talk:Holborn Viaduct railway station/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 12:17, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

: The article complies with MOS policies on grammar, as well as general layout and structure. We Wikipedians only take NO for an answer! (talk) 02:11, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

: The article uses multiple reputable sources for reference, and does not appear to incorporate any original research. We Wikipedians only take NO for an answer! (talk) 02:09, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)
 * (c)

: The article seems to satisfactorily cover all aspects of its topic for which encyclopedic information with reputable sourcing can be reasonably found. We Wikipedians only take NO for an answer! (talk) 02:08, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

. The article does not appear to showcase any biased viewpoints regarding any aspect of its subject. We Wikipedians only take NO for an answer! (talk) 02:07, 14 January 2019 (UTC) . Since at least March 2017, according to the most recent revisions, the article has not been subjected to any form of disruptive editing such as edit warring or the like. We Wikipedians only take NO for an answer! (talk) 00:41, 14 January 2019 (UTC) : All five image files currently used in the article are freely licensed, and serve relevant illustrative purposes within the article's context. We Wikipedians only take NO for an answer! (talk) 00:40, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

After reading over this article, and making a few slight grammatical tweaks, I believe it satisfies the criteria, and thereby qualifies as a GA. Congratulations! We Wikipedians only take NO for an answer! (talk) 02:12, 14 January 2019 (UTC)