Talk:Holby City series 1/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 14:03, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: I fixed one disambiguation link.diff

Linkrot: No dead links found

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * This article is reasonably well written and follows the Manual of Style. I made a few minor copy edits.diff
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * The artcile is well referenced, no dead links, references are reliable sources, no dead links
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Broasd, thorough and focussed
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I am happy that this article meets the GA criteria, so am happy to list it. Congratulations. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 14:28, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I am happy that this article meets the GA criteria, so am happy to list it. Congratulations. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 14:28, 24 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much for your review, and also for the copy edit. Some of the typos that had slipped through were shameful, thank you for catching them! Frickative  15:33, 24 April 2010 (UTC)