Talk:Hollywood Rip Ride Rockit/Archives/2008

Hold your horses ...
Almost all of this article is speculation or derived from blogs, which are not verifiable sources per Wikipedia convention. The opening paragraph has all of three sentences, which isn't a bad thing ... except, two of those contain blatant speculation. Universal hasn't announced the project, so how is it possible to say that it would be anything close to Japan's Hollywood Dream, or what attractions would be closed to make way for it?

McDoobAU93 (talk) 18:32, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes. It seems that the only verifiable proof in the article is the document which Universal faxed to Orange County, which Screamscape.com got a hold of. The article needs either an entire rewrite or deletion.--72.91.191.67 (talk) 19:24, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Done. Almost all speculation has been removed. Waiting to see how long it takes until it gets reverted. --McDoobAU93 (talk) 21:53, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

New Verifiable Sources
Accoding to screamscape, Universal has filed various other documents for Project Rumble. They even have official links to them: Link--Snowman Guy (talk) 14:49, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Article organization
I think that the "Construction" subheading should actually be moved up into "Attraction history," since its construction is more part of its history, not its layout. Further, we shouldn't be including all these little details, since there's a high probability that a reader of the article has never been to Universal Studios Florida, and thus would have no idea what we're talking about. I'm going to be bold and make the change, but please take a look and see what you think. --McDoobAU93 (talk) 17:58, 11 December 2008 (UTC)