Talk:Holman Fenwick Willan

Comments
I see no notability here. Please, either expand, or stop removing my db tags. Niki Whimbrel 19:40, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

I've added more detail and references here. This is a notable UK firm. Unlikelyheroine 11:48, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.hfw.com/about-us/history. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:51, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Edit request 12-JUL-2018
Please change the firm name to HFW. It currently says Holman Fenwick Willan but the firm rebranded last summer. Evidence of this is shown on a press release here: http://www.hfw.com/We-are-now-HFW W1ki-edit-p1x1e (talk) 16:53, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Reply 12-JUL-2018
The page space marked HFW is already taken, existing as a disambiguation page for the Holman article and five others. Thus, this article cannot be renamed to. If it were renamed to an acronym, a qualification placed in parenthesis would need to be selected (e.g.,, etc.) Please advise on whether this is acceptable. When ready to proceed, please change the request template's answer parameter to read from ans=yes to ans=no. Regards,  spintendo   18:32, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

ans=yes W1ki-edit-p1x1e (talk) 08:32, 13 July 2018 (UTC)