Talk:Holocaust uniqueness debate

Original research
The difference is that Lim is specifically discussing the issue of Holocaust uniqueness, while the second source you are citing is not. So, I think it would violate WP:NOR to include it. A more popular exponent of this view is Steven T. Katz, and there are indeed sources discussing his view in relation to Holocaust uniqueness, although I'm unsure about WP:DUE. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  06:06, 21 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The paragraph starting with "Others argue that the term "genocide" cannot be used for all instances of mass killings..." is also concerning. There are various definitions of genocide and the most widely used one (Genocide Convention) is not applicable to "all mass killings", but neither is it restricted to the holocaust. Various alternatives to the genocide concept have been proposed, but it's not clear what that has to do with the Holocaust uniqueness debate. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  02:57, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

UNDUE issues
This is a topic that has been covered by multiple overview sources, which should be the basis of the article. Specific scholars stating "I think the Holocaust is unique" is not very informative, especially when you pick ones that are not noteworthy or influential. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  14:08, 16 April 2024 (UTC)