Talk:Holt, Worcestershire

A very complete history, but absolutely  no  information  available about  the current day, and no references whatsoever to  check  on  the source(s). It mostly  reads like an essay, which  could suggest copyvio. I've contacted the major contributors/editors and if nothing happens in a day or two, I'll reduce it to  a stub.--Kudpung (talk) 02:22, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Google brings up nothing to suggest its a copyvio. To claim a copyvio you need to have proof, and there simply isn't any. I suspect its just a well written piece of text that just hasn't been sourced. It would be much more productive to try to source it than to remove it. Jenuk1985  |  Talk  02:40, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It looks like when the article was created some of the content was copied or adapted from a website, although it looks like the creator of the article owns the copyright (if there isn't a reply from the user then maybe it could be confirmed by emailing the website). snigbrook (talk) 14:04, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I very  cautiously wrote: "could suggest" when I  mentioned copyvio. I've checked the article history  and the creator  is User:PeterHancocks who  has not  been active since 2006. The article is clearly  OR but  he provides a bibliography on  his website at at  here. I'm  not sure what  we are supposed to  do  about  this.--Kudpung (talk) 13:04, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Give me a few days and I'll see what sources I can dig out. Jeni  ( talk ) 13:20, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I know you're pretty good at  this sort of thing  Jeni, but  I  think  your're going  to  have your work  cut  out here to  find sources for the existing  articles.  Wikipedia:No original research is unambiguous,  but  this and his Little Witley article were well  researched and written  in  good faith, and they have a rare quality  about  them that  should be  retained in  the encyclopedia.  I have written  to  him by  e-mail as I  am sure he no  longer logs on  to  Wiki, and I  feel  sure he will  come on  line and we can all come up  with  something  together that  complies with  the rules. In  the meantime I  have removed all  the ugly  cn tags I  placed. --Kudpung (talk) 14:41, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Well I can dig out whatever citations I can, which should suffice pending whatever we decide to do next! :) Jeni  ( talk ) 14:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Henry Bromley
There are certainly inaccuracies in relation to Henry Bromley. In 1601 he was arrested as a supporter of the Earl of Essex, but as he was not attainted, his lands were not confiscated. In fact, he had to apply for permission to sell some of them to pay his fine, although he actually mortgaged his estates in Montgomeryshire, not those around Holt. There is actually quite a lot of useful material to support/refute other parts of this article in VCH, and the volume on this parish is easily available online. Sjwells53 (talk) 20:49, 8 April 2014 (UTC)


 * I reckon the first step is removing the incorrect information from this article. Would you like to do the honours? Nev1 (talk) 21:32, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Holt Fleet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20020805075557/http://www.phancocks.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/localhistory/localhis.htm to http://www.phancocks.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/localhistory/localhis.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:57, 6 November 2017 (UTC)