Talk:Holt Manufacturing Company/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 09:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Minor prose issues which I have fixed, and article complies to MoS.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * All references appear to be in order.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Requirements in this area have been met.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Complies with WP:NPOV.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Article appears to be stable.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Pictures comply with fair use requirements and captions are all in order.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Summary: There were a few minor prose issues, mainly to do with punctuation. As they were minor, I decided to fix these myself. A lot of work has gone into this article. I am satisfied that this article complies with all the requirements for a Good Article, and I am happy to pass it for GA status. Congratulations to all those involved.