Talk:Home, Washington

Proposed merge of Home Colony into Home, Washington
Same subject, but there isn't enough content in the fork to justify a standalone article  Sounder Bruce  01:14, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The census-dedicated place is independently notable and the colony has entire books written about it. That's plenty for standalone articles. czar  01:50, 27 May 2021 (UTC)


 * oppose —¿philoserf? (talk) 09:27, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Support There is no purpose served having a small article that is basically a split of the proposed Target article that adds no additional insight or content. The target (Home, Washington) has a more in-depth view of the whole Colony experiment and area history.  It actually needs more information about notable non-colony events, if such are available.  Nothing is gained by fracturing this interesting subject into two rather duplicative articles.  Even though the place-name may be more modernized, it is still the same place, with the same history.  These two should be merged.  GenQuest  "scribble" 13:19, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * There are books written about the colony. There is no such coverage about the census-designated place. We keep articles for "populated, legally recognized places" per WP:GEOLAND even if they are small, but that does not change the fact that there is more than enough content to warrant a separate article on the colony. czar  15:25, 25 July 2021 (UTC)