Talk:Home (Star Trek: Enterprise)

Fair use rationale for Image:Home (ENT episode).jpg
Image:Home (ENT episode).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Considering the Trivia section
I deleted the bit about the people who were at the awards ceremony. I felt it was, pun not intended, illogical. Of course only the bridge crew will be there, that's who the actors are being paid to portray. Also, the sentences about how Phlox deserved less recognition was very confusing, he did many heroic things.

NX-02 Columbia page
Why was the Columbia page removed!!?? I had contributed a lot on it!!

Considering the Trivia section II
This is not the first apperiance of Enterprise's syster ship Columbia. It was seen in at least one earlier episode.

Robert1980 00:04, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Home (Star Trek: Enterprise). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire/art-main.html?2004-10%2F22%2F10.30.tv
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140811081825/http://abcmedianet.com/web/dnr/dispDNR.aspx?id=110904_04 to http://abcmedianet.com/web/dnr/dispDNR.aspx?id=110904_04
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141010224559/http://abcmedianet.com/web/dnr/dispDNR.aspx?id=111604_05 to http://abcmedianet.com/web/dnr/dispDNR.aspx?id=111604_05
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://tv.zap2it.com/tveditorial/tve_main/1%2C1002%2C272%7C91256%7C1%7C%2C00.html
 * Added tag to http://trekweb.com/stories.php?aid=41792bd88775e

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:56, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Home (Star Trek: Enterprise). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090601194225/http://abcmedianet.com/web/dnr/dispDNR.aspx?id=101904_12 to http://abcmedianet.com/web/dnr/dispDNR.aspx?id=101904_12

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:16, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Ratings
I'm not clear on the Ratings. Zap2it (a source used in various other articles in this series) said: On UPN, "Enterprise" had a 1.9/4 and edged "What I Like About You" and "Grounded for Life" on The WB.  But the other sources seem to be saying the ratings were 1.7/3 and not 1.9/4. Maybe Zap2it were reporting earlier ratings and the other sources were reporting the finalized ratings? Can anyone clear this up? -- 109.79.65.11 (talk) 23:37, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Maybe someone accidentally included the ratings for Storm Front part 2 October 15, 2004 instead of this episode? -- 109.79.65.11 (talk) 23:37, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
 * TVTango has a list for the whole season, they put the rating at 2/4 which unfortunately doesn't help clarify anything. -- 109.79.65.11 (talk) 01:08, 2 May 2021 (UTC)