Talk:Home Alone/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Matthew R Dunn (talk · contribs) 16:48, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello, I will conduct the review shortly. -- Matthew RD 16:48, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Criteria

 * 1) Well written: ❌.
 * 2) Sources: ❌
 * 3) Broadness in coverage: ❌. The article seems a little too short.
 * 4) Neutral: From what I've seen, nothing is bias. ✅
 * 5) Stability: Quite a lot or reversions, but only due to IP edits. No serious edit wars though. ✅
 * 6) Images: One non-free image with appropriate tags and fair use rationale. I'm not sure about this image though, it does not have a proper fair use rationale.

Comments

 * The lead mentions Culkin won an award, but it isn't mentioned in the reception section. The lead section should summarise the full article.
 * The production section is short, as per the tag. All the production info is on the filming side. Isn't there anything on the casting? Writing? How the film was conceived?
 * 3.5 bathrooms?
 * I think the reception could do with a few more reviews. This article lists six reviews, but according to Rotton Tomatoes there are 40. A few more can't hurt
 * There is an awful lot of content that is unsourced. I have editing in the citation needed tags on the end of each parapgraph that isn't referenced.
 * What's the publisher and author name of Ref #2?
 * Same with Ref #3
 * Quite a lot of the refs do not have the author's names (though some may not have them included in the page itself) or proper publishers.
 * Ref #13 is dead.

I'm afraid that's a fail. There are quite a few unsourced content and the production section is lacking. I also noticed that the nominator did not actually edit this article recently, which is not a good sign. After the comments are taken care of, take it to be peer reviewed again (last one was in 2008 and it was not a helpful one), then you may renominate it. -- Matthew RD 16:20, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Dddssddddderrrrrffffftty7utytttttttyrtrredsgafwruusydjdjfigogohfihcuhkfhjogihihigjjfghkgjcgkttie7wuwtusrururjeudgdbdgdhsffujkkjfsfhfudggffdddd

N.      Nfhcggvgh  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 102.89.45.152 (talk) 16:05, 22 June 2023 (UTC)