Talk:Home health nursing

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Pauliana Landreth, Alliacev, ALAlmond7288. Peer reviewers: TLund, Trinalynnie, Shilpaus76, Joce.lee.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kw159713.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Beneficial Academic Sources to Add
I have found an article that may be beneficial to the article once it is built up more. This academic journal discusses the medical treatment benefits and financial benefits of discharging patients to home health instead of keeping them in the hospital. Alliacev (talk) 17:27, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Here is an article regarding patient safety and quality home health care.

The community nursing textbook being cited has a chapter discussing the basics of home health nursing. This includes the history, scope of practice, the Omaha System, evidence-based practice, and legal and ethical issues concerning home health nursing.

The Foundations of Nursing text book provides an overview of nursing as a whole. The book gives a concise view of home health nursing that would improve the Home Health Nursing Wikipedia article. Pauliana Landreth (talk) 18:27, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Review
This article was informational with good sources. The lead was informational,concise and I think laid out well where the article was going. It was a little weak in the sections part so I would add anything that is reliable to support this. Self care facilitation section could use much more supporting evidence- or I would recommend renaming the section to something that more information could be added.The article did seem to become a little bit like an encyclopedia because as informational as it could be some parts were very factual short and concise. This could make the author lose credibility with the reader or appear left undone.Joce.lee (talk) 00:12, 14 October 2017 (UTC)