Talk:Homeopathic repertory

Editing Reverted
The editing done in Homeopathic repertory page was reverted. I have personally verified the content added by the editor and it is verifiable. Moreover neutrality of the content is maintained. The homoeopathic repertory page has never altered or questioned the 'broad consensus' of 'Homeopathy' wiki page. If left without reverting, I'm sure more editors will fill content as per the guidelines of wikipedia.I strongly feel that rest of mankind can learn different techniques of construction of lexicon using mathematical logic through this page.Dr Kurian John Poruthukaren 15:57, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Untitled
The page does not solve the purpose. The matter is haphazored and unbalanced. It needs to re-write the page. I will request to Dr. George Vithaulkas to prepare the page in new manner and in his own way because he is expertise in Homoeopathic Repertory.

User:Dbbajpai1945@sify.com 07:50 PM IST  15 August 2006
 * , it is not about one's expertise; rather, it is about the policies and guidelines editors are expected to follow. works with WP:WikiProject Med and is far more qualified than I when it comes to discussing the requirements for articles related to Homeopathy and what qualifies for inclusion per WP:RS, WP:NOR, WP:V and WP:MEDRS. I have pinged him for his assistance. Another helpful editor is  who contributes at WP:Teahouse when time allows. Atsme 📞📧 17:37, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello, . You were trying to ping . That space is important. I do not think we need to worry too much about an 11 year old comment. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  18:17, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * *LOL* OMG - my apologies, - my post was regarding this edit which was in response to a redirect here. It appears I accidentally dropped one of the balls pins I was juggling...Atsme 📞📧 18:37, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Dear Cullen Atsme was replying to my comment which is placed above the comment of Dbbajpai1945@sify.com. Dr Kurian John Poruthukaren 18:34, 24 September 2017 (UTC) drpjkurian