Talk:Homer the Vigilante/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

""Bart's pain is funny but mine isn't.""

- Lisa Simpson

The article does not have serious issues that would warrant a quick-fail. Real review will commence sometime during the weekend :) decltype (talk) 15:21, 12 June 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose):
 * The prose is clear and the spelling and grammar are correct.
 * b (MoS):
 * Looks good.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references):
 * b (citations to reliable sources):
 * c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its scope.
 * a (major aspects):
 * b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * I made a similar adjustment to the FUR here as with Bart vs. Thanksgiving.
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * I made a similar adjustment to the FUR here as with Bart vs. Thanksgiving.
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Yet another solid piece of work. The production section seems slightly smaller than the other episodes I have reviewed, but I guess that's just a result of less information being available. Still, I feel that all major aspects are covered, so no problem there. The only issue I really have is that the dates of some of the references are inconsistently formatted. I prefer the ISO style since the "retrieved on" will automatically be formatted that way when using a citation template. But it doesn't matter which is used as long as it's consistent. When that's been taken care of, I see no reason not to list. decltype (talk) 17:24, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, there wasn't much information available for this episode. Anyway, I think I fixed the references thingy. Thanks for reviewing! :)  The Le ft orium  17:38, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, looks good. Article passed. I'm a little busy right now, but I'll do all the stuff in a minute :) decltype (talk) 17:48, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Mange takk! ;)  The Le ft orium  17:53, 14 June 2009 (UTC)