Talk:Homework (Daft Punk album)/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Hahc21 (talk · contribs) 14:03, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi All. I'll be reviewing this article for the next few weeks. --Hahc21 (talk) 14:03, 28 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Ok, the first thing that needs a change is the lead section. It is too disperse and do not meet the criteria. --Hahc21 (talk) 14:27, 28 April 2012 (UTC)


 * I've modified the lead section to comply with the Manual of Style. --Hahc21 (talk) 23:38, 28 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Ok, since i know that when i make a considerable number of edits on an article, i get emotionally involved with it, i will no edit this article to meet the GA criteria. Then, my personal criteria would or could not be as neutral as it should be, so i'll ask project pages and frequent collaborators to give me some hands on improving this article. --Hahc21 (talk) 03:32, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Structure section
I've selected some statements that needs to be rewritten or verified on the Structure section: That's all for today. --Hahc21 (talk) 03:34, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I've revisited the reference and now it works. So, i modified the issue. I'll be takin of the Issue No.1 by myself. --Hahc21 (talk) 05:21, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * User fixed the issue. Thanks. --Hahc21 (talk) 05:25, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I couldn't find a reference for No. 3, so I removed it. I don't get issues No. 4 and 5 though. They cite the companion book of the DVD, not the link. What a pro (talk, contribs) thinks that ohhhh, ohhh, woaaah-oh-oh-ohhhhh . 08:12, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I originally provided the refs for the 3, 4 and 5, so I went in and made some clarifications. Feel free to let me know if there's still an issue. jhsounds (talk) 15:25, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey! I don't get much issue with No.4 and No.5 either, but i put them on the list to see if there's a more comprehensive information out there. If not, then i let the sentences as they are. No problem. --Hahc21 (talk) 16:27, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Recording history section
I've selected some statements that needs to be rewritten or verified on the Recording history section:
 * I found several other minor issues that i took out by myself, like some redundant wording, etc. --Hahc21 (talk) 16:44, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm thinking about putting on the lead section, where the album was mixed, recorded and mastered. I think it should be there. --Hahc21 (talk) 16:55, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I went in and made some further wording tweaks. Electronic is sort of an important modifier in that the demo was their first work as Daft Punk, as opposed to the rock music they did as part of the band Darlin'. jhsounds (talk) 00:13, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Second phase
Ok. It seems all references are ok, and all statements are well-written and correctly referenced. Now, i'll be reviewing the structure of the paragraphs, sections, order, semantics and syntax. --Hahc21 (talk) 03:36, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

NVPI certification
Hey guys the NVPI certification reference is dead. I need someone to help me find a new one, because i don't speak neither german nor dutch... Thanks --Hahc21 (talk) 18:43, 1 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I deleted the certification from the table until a reference is found. I've "comprehensively" searched the NVPI website and it says no certification know for 1997 until 2006. So, it'll be difficult to find a reference. But either if somebody find one, don't hesitate tu restore the info on the table. --Hahc21 (talk) 19:15, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Final round
Ok, so almost everything that needed to be done, is done. Tomorrow i'll issue the final round of fixes and check the article against the Good article criteria to make my final vote. --Hahc21 (talk) 04:59, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I still believe there is information out there on the internet to complement this article, so i'll delay the verdict for one day or two fo find all relevant info i can and include it into the article. --Hahc21 (talk) 22:59, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

The Verdict

 * Final commentary: After some major improvements, Homework is ready as a good article and meets all good article criteria. Thanks to all who controbuted on the article, mainly to and, who helped me during the review process.