Talk:Hominid dispersals in Europe

Untitled
mv'ed from article


 * 1) Impact of colonization on Europeans
 * 2) The exploration of the Americas forever changed the course of world history
 * 3) Impact on Europe
 * Several European countries began “the great race” for establishing control of the continents of North and South America
 * Europeans now had a viable option to seek refuge from religious persecution


 * 1) Impact on Europe cont.


 * War between these countries became inevitable
 * As the countries began to jockey for position in the Americas, there were several strains on the relationships amidst the competing nations.


 * 1) The line in the sand was drawn and the signs pointed toward conflict
 * Initially, European activity consisted mostly of trade and exploration. Eventually Europeans began to establish settlements. The three principal colonial powers were Spain, England, and France.

Seems that an editor left this here to be expanded ... --J. D. Redding 13:51, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Rename
Perhaps Homonid migrations to Europe would reflect the article contents better? Power~enwiki (talk) 05:05, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

I support the rename that has occurred. No further comment. Power~enwiki (talk) 23:40, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Synthesis
Why the addition of "Neogene apes"? This was clearly intended as the page for "early Human migrations (Europe)", why expand the time horizon to random additional genera outside Homo? I imagine this was inspired by the title change to "hominid". Why not just change "Hominid" to "Early human", or just "human" and get a topical scope that makes sense? --dab (𒁳) 08:14, 17 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Well the original intent was a rather unfocused colonization in Europe. It was renamed to Hominid dispersals in Europe following an AfD, which I suggested because the best content in the existing article was on prehistoric dispersals and that's a cohesive encyclopedic topic. It seemed logical to me to start that with the earliest hominids pre-Pleistocene. I think restricting it to Homo would be a bit arbitrary, and "early human" and "human" are ambiguous in a prehistoric context. Why do you think the current scope doesn't make sense? –Joe (talk) 09:40, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: ANTR 8 World Prehistory in Archaeological Perspective
— Assignment last updated by ParisMacB (talk) 03:26, 28 September 2022 (UTC)