Talk:Hompegg Falls

Proposed deletion
I removed the template for deletion of the page as it is a landmark, albeit local notability, remarkable enough a road is named after the waterfall and it has been the scene of public events as recent as 2004 (published) as well as a landmark in several published documents and common in maps. The article, similar to Numa Falls, for example, is orphan and needs additional tags, yet unlike Numa Falls, was started with reliable references and has been extended since the deletion proposal. It follows WP:GNG since its first writing, more so now with added epigraphs. The location is robust enough that it fits the presumption for merits to its own article. As a consequence:
 * with the removal of the article. Fimbriata (talk) 20:06, 28 June 2021 (UTC)