Talk:Hong Joon-pyo

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hong Jun-pyo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111104185352/http://news.hankooki.com/lpage/politics/201110/h2011102102383921000.htm to http://news.hankooki.com/lpage/politics/201110/h2011102102383921000.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141226121448/http://governor.gsnd.net/jsp/main/main.jsp to http://governor.gsnd.net/jsp/main/main.jsp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:55, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

HONG NO LONGER HAS "STRONG CONSERVATIVE CHARACTERISTICS".
STOP SAYING SO. YOU MUSTN'T EVEN BE KOREAN. 1.235.177.36 (talk) 05:42, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Please stop lying. He is still considered a conservative figure within the PPP.--Storm598 (talk) 06:08, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

What I'm saying is true... just ask a random Korean that currently lives in Korea. Or check other wikis about Hong.
 * I'm a South Korean. And Wiki can't be the basis. In addition, it is only nonsense to say that he is centre-right because he is supported by "Angry young men".--Storm598 (talk) 22:10, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * It's a completely different matter for him to be supported by young people and for his political position to be center-right. Is there any evidence that young people in South Korea are politically more moderate than sampallyuk people?? --Storm598 (talk) 22:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Populism?
Hello,

The evidence for him having "populistic characteristics" was a single column written by an unauthorized writer and was written to attack Hong. Not an actual source.

His impression as a "strong conservative, populistic figure" is now gone here in Korea. Please do not use a column as a source, or anything from 2017.

Even without the fact that the evidence was invalid, referring to him as a "right wing populist" is first not the case and second not neutrally descripted.

I suggest describing him as a conservative instead. Also, I suggest adding more information about his life before politics, there's a lot known about it including his story as a prosecutor.

I suggest checking other wikis about him, maybe on namuwiki(It's in Korean though).

Thanks, have a nice weekend. 1.235.177.36 (talk) 13:52, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Hong is a centrist.
He had to act like a strong one due to political situations but he was the one who proposed the apartment half-price bill, the Nationality Act...etc. He's actually a centrist. 1.235.177.36 (talk) 10:21, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Cut the crap. You should not write your OR on the wiki. Just by looking at the extreme social conservative personality he sees, you can see that he is never a "centrist".--Storm598 (talk) 10:28, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

- Oh yeah? Why is a column provided as an evidence? This is stupid, no one does that shit.

Why is his life as a prosecutor not included in "Early Life"?
It's a major part of his life... 1.235.177.36 (talk) 10:25, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

We should add a Prosecutorial career section.
Kinda also related to his political career. 1.235.177.36 (talk) 02:23, 21 January 2022 (UTC)