Talk:Hong Kong/GA2

The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

This orange-tagged article clearly fails criteria 2b. There are many paragraphs lacking citations. I brought this issue up at the talk page a while ago, but there doesn't seem to be much interest.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 16:47, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All paragraphs now properly cited, found deadlinks had been replaced or removed. T his Avatar (discuss–?) 06:40, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Nice job. The article looks good now, but I'll keep this GAR open for a week in case others want to comment.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 13:57, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep There were many unwanted contents but I can see most of them have been removed and I believe all of the paragraphs are now properly cited. Further work needs to be done but it should now be allowed to retain its status as a good article. Knight of Gloucestershire (talk) 19:09, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Result: Keep The issues that led to this GAR have been resolved.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 19:03, 16 June 2013 (UTC)