Talk:Hong Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance

To be added (machine translated): “Section 4 is used in the future on the legal provisions in force. The "Public Order Ordinance," for example, because of its provisions and the "Convention" inconsistent, so was amended in 1995. As the "Rights" was legal in Hong Kong enjoys a position of supremacy, so the composition of the pro-China Council considered a violation of the "Basic Law" and Article 2, paragraph 3, 3 and 4 in the transfer of sovereignty after the abolition, not adopted as laws of the Region, but also the "Public Order Ordinance" and "Covenant" part to restore conflict.” – Kaihsu (talk) 18:10, 24 November 2011 (UTC)