Talk:Hooters, Inc.

Merge suggestion
If this page is merged with Hooters, you really need to do a 3-way merge. Hooters, Inc. is separate from Hooters of America, Inc, even though both of them have interlocking rights to trade under the Hooters name. --Randal L. Schwartz 01:46, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * That is why I removed the merge request. You have two companies who share a restaurant brand and own different other assets operating under the brand.  So keep the two companies separate as well as what is owned and operated.  It's the only way to keep it sorted out.  Vegaswikian 06:30, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I have suggested a merge again. The airline is defunct, and both of the separate operator articles are one-paragraph stubs that are unlikely to be expanded beyond that point. It can be explained in the main article how the two companies are related, as the current articles don't adequately explain the relationship anyway.  Horologium  (talk) 19:55, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, the airline is being revived. While I wouldn't be opposed to a merge, I think that recognizing the complex relationship between the brand, the two companies, the other franchisees, and the peripheral items, like the casino, the racing, and the airline is useful.  So if it could be kept clear in a merged article, go for it. --Randal L. Schwartz (talk) 20:11, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Article was redirected to Hooters, after a lack of discussion at that article's talk page.  Horologium  (talk) 23:57, 6 January 2008 (UTC)