Talk:Hops and cannabinoids

Recent addition of patents
Wikipedia usually discourages patents as citations for several reasons. One of the most important is we don't have a way to really evaluate the importance of the patent just from its own existence. This really needs secondary sources. Could the editor who added this either discuss it here, or try again with a more balanced approach that looks less like promotion for a product or process? ☆ Bri (talk) 21:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Also, please check out MOS:TM ☆ Bri (talk) 21:12, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

removed section based on retracted article
I removed the section on Humulus Kriya per Wikipedia guidelines on 'reliable sources' stating that contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced… should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion. The sources cited are '404 - Page Not Found' dead links. The High Times blog and others appear to have echoed or "recapped" a single originating PotNetwork article which the publisher couldn't verify, deleted and apoligized for. MoshiMoshi2 (talk) 17:44, 5 December 2019 (UTC)