Talk:Horrible Histories

Move?

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. No support here for the revert. DrKiernan (talk) 18:43, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Horrible Histories → Horrible Histories (franchise) –
 * Reverse a recent move which was listed as uncontroversial. And redirect Horrible Histories to Horrible Histories (book series). (Request in my user talk page by a user who says that the book series is the primary meaning.) relisted Tiggerjay (talk) 20:11, 14 April 2013 (UTC) Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:02, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Oppose - ghits suggests that both are about the same in usage in the prior 90 days, about 11k and 12k each. So there is no clear PRIMARYTOPIC here, however since the franchise is the bigger scope (parent entity) it would make sense for it to have the simpler name, and have the book series be the one requiring parenthetical disambiguation. Tiggerjay (talk) 06:35, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The comments under "Historical accuracy" don't seem to be really about the accuracy of the show, but more about whether it's good educational material, or even good. And why do we have the opinions of a politician who's never even seen the program?125.230.97.217 (talk) 05:53, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Horrible Histories. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090330072639/http://www.terry-deary.com/shop/pages/horrhistory.html to http://www.terry-deary.com/shop/pages/horrhistory.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120423155924/http://www.terry-deary.net/adventure/diary.htm to http://www.terry-deary.net/adventure/diary.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150507161751/http://www.intersections.tv/uk/2010_Final_Nominations.pdf to http://www.intersections.tv/uk/2010_Final_Nominations.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:06, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Horrible Histories. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120219185522/http://www.netimperative.com/news/2010/april/scholastic-creates-virtual-world-for-horrible to http://www.netimperative.com/news/2010/april/scholastic-creates-virtual-world-for-horrible
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131220083949/http://www.sophisticated-games.com/sophisticated_web/aboutus.htm to http://www.sophisticated-games.com/sophisticated_web/aboutus.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111227124447/http://www.sophisticated-games.com/sophisticated_web/Horrible_Histories_Rotten_Romans.htm to http://www.sophisticated-games.com/sophisticated_web/Horrible_Histories_Rotten_Romans.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131227004429/http://www.redbeemedia.com/work/horrible-histories-cbbc-yourself to http://www.redbeemedia.com/work/horrible-histories-cbbc-yourself
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131227004442/http://www.redbeemedia.com/work/horrible-histories-horrible-hero to http://www.redbeemedia.com/work/horrible-histories-horrible-hero
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131227074546/http://www.liontv.com/London/Lion-Interactive/Case-Study---Horrible-Histories-AD-BC-Time-Tour to http://www.liontv.com/London/Lion-Interactive/Case-Study---Horrible-Histories-AD-BC-Time-Tour

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:54, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Horrible Histories. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131219202547/http://www.educationsupplies.co.uk/brainbox-horrible-histories-vile-villains to http://www.educationsupplies.co.uk/brainbox-horrible-histories-vile-villains

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:17, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Spin offs
The "Boring Bible" book series is listed as a spin-off in the footer to the Horrible Histories page. But as far as I can see the Boring Bible series is merely inspired by the Horrible... series; different publishers and authors trying to use the same format/concept for a different subject. They're not in any official way related, unlike the Science and Geography series which are all published by Scholastic and more obviously direct spin offs. Much of the Boring Bible page has been written or edited by the author of the books himself. Does the Boring Bible link actually belong in this footer? Edit: After reflection and further research, I've removed the Boring Bible link. Every other spin off book series listed here is published by Scholastic and directly linked to Horrible Histories.

Box in the article is spoiling the alignment of the text
In my opinion, something should be done about the box with text in it in the article as it is affecting the alignment of the text within the article, making the article look unprofessional in my opinion. Xboxsponge15 (talk) 12:37, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The box contained an extended quotation from a newspaper which I assessed as a copyright violation, so I removed it. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)