Talk:Horse Hollow Wind Energy Center

Self-promotion
Is this article really necessary? There is very little added to the information of location and size that would seem to merit a separate article. Furthermore, the main source is a company press release, which most of the article simply paraphrases. —Kerberos (talk) 12:02, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I would say that most wind farms are notable. At 735.5 MW, this is a clearly notable wind farm - it was at the time of its construction the largest in the world. This wind farm is further notable due to the lawsuit against it. In fact, given your modus operandi, I would venture that it is the result of this lawsuit that is causing you to question this article's notability. It might need expanding a bit but it is definitely notable.
 * I do agree that the last (fourth) paragraph of the article reads as somewhat self-promoting and maybe should be removed. However the first two paragraphs are basic facts about the farm, and the third deals with the lawsuit - rst20xx (talk) 19:55, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Surely every target of a suit doesn't merit its own article. The lawsuit is treated in the [Environmental effects of wind power] article. —Kerberos (talk) 21:37, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Well no, but as I said, I think most wind farms are notable anyway, and the size of this wind farm also makes it very notable - rst20xx (talk) 21:48, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Given your modus operandi? —Kerberos (talk) 00:13, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * As a general Wikipedia editor, who is here to improve the encyclopaedia and not just push a point of view on wind farms? Take it to AFD if you like - you'll lose - rst20xx (talk) 12:39, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * You say that "most wind farms are notable"—that looks like a point of view to me, and your peevish replies to my comments look like you're pushing that point of view. If your idea of an encyclopedia is that it serve as a PR outlet for energy companies, so be it. —Kerberos (talk) 14:32, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I think most wind farms are notable because I think most major structures, and certainly most major energy-providing structures, are notable - rst20xx (talk) 14:28, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Where are the stats?
The largest wind farm in the U.S. can't even discuss its own efficiency? How much was the initial investment? What deals were made? How much usable enerby does it generate in a year? C'mon this is a STUB at best and political engineering at worst.--71.245.164.83 (talk) 01:29, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Horse Hollow Wind Energy Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928084242/http://www.nawindpower.com/naw/e107_plugins/content/content.php?content.335 to http://www.nawindpower.com/naw/e107_plugins/content/content.php?content.335

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:29, 5 April 2017 (UTC)