Talk:Horsemen of the Esophagus

Notability: Released on April 25, as of April 27 there are 8 articles in Google News. From Naming_conventions_%28books%29
 * Nonetheless there is no dictum against any book that is reasonably spread or otherwise well-known or remarkable. Ask yourself if several libraries or bookshops, or a no-subscription website have a copy of the book, so that other wikipedians can easily consult the book, or at least have access to on-line or press-published reviews of the book.
 * Usually, books with an ISBN-number and/or availability in a couple dozen of libraries and/or a Project Gutenberg type website, and with a notability above that of an average cookbook or programmers manual would qualify.

If you want to insist the book is not notable today and send the article to AfD that is your right, but this is a topic of significant public interest (see Morgan Spurlock) and I would be very much surprised not to see this book on the NYT bestseller list in a couple of weeks. The article needs a bit of cleanup, and some expansion once a wikipedian has read it, of course. Can you wait two weeks? Thatcher131 00:29, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Horsemen of the Esophagus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060705195152/http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2006/04/19/nerz/index_np.html to http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2006/04/19/nerz/index_np.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:37, 6 November 2017 (UTC)