Talk:Hot House Entertainment

Sources press release
The entire history section is taken verbatim from their website (http://press.hothouse.com/company_info.php) and should be rewritten for neutrality. Most of the references point to various sections of their website, and the online properties section reads like a navigation menu. I deleted the most egregious entries but the remaining ones could stand a rewrite as well. Leliro19 (talk) 06:29, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Online properties
These should be explained either generally or possibly also specifically, what does it mean and what's the difference between them if any. Benjiboi 13:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Possible sources
Hot House search on xbiz and on Gay Porn Times. Benjiboi 23:05, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

COI and adverts by paid editors
An extensive discussion on COI and adverts in this article can be found at Coin Smallbones (talk) 11:53, 18 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Blanket and empty vague insinuations are unproductive. Please demonstrate actual COI content before re-adding. -- Banj e  b oi   13:30, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Stubbification
The awards section seems appropriate to include and I think it should be restored (unless there is an argument that they are not legitimate awards?). I didn't look carefully at the rest of what was removed, but I think a description of their movie lines and divisions seems reasonable. I think a trim and tweak was needed, but I'm wonder if it might have been overdone? ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:09, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Do we really need adverts like:

Film lines

....

Club Inferno - A gay fisting and fetish brand featuring up and coming new directors.

Pack Attack Video - A mid-priced gay gangbang product line launched in 2005.
 * I think not. As far as the awards, if they are referenced in a main stream reliable source, they can be included, but if they are linked to a pay for porn site - no way! Smallbones (talk) 13:15, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually a good article would certainly discuss these - and you're removing content not because it's untrue but simply because you apparently don't approve. I'll look to restoring easily sourced material despite the bad faith accusations and insinuations. -- Banj e  b oi   01:59, 6 October 2009 (UTC)