Talk:Hot hand/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: LauraHale (talk · contribs) 03:06, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

This article is being reviewed against the following criteria:

A good article is&mdash;  :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

:
 * (a) ;
 * (b) ; and
 * (c).

:
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

. . :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).



Well-written
Article reads like an essay, not a Wikipedia article written in summary story. Please review WP:MOS. Does not appear to comply with WP:NPOV because of selection of references mentioned. Why is A study by Koehler, J. J. & Conley C. A. referenced? WP:LEDE does not appear to be followed. Article has tags at the top. (And no, I did not put them there.) --LauraHale (talk) 03:06, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Factually accurate and verifiable
The article has large tracts of text that are not cited. This is an absolute must before an article can be passed. --LauraHale (talk) 03:06, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

"A study by Koehler, J. J. & Conley C. A." appears. The source cited is A study by Koehler, J. J. & Conley C. A.. This violates WP:MEDRS because primary sources cannot be used. --LauraHale (talk) 03:06, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Neutral
The essay like nature of the article means the article is non-neutral. The selection of studies appears to be selective, with out any secondary sources justifying their inclusion.--LauraHale (talk) 03:06, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Stable
Article does not appear to be stable. --LauraHale (talk) 03:06, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Illustrated, if possible, by images
The topic seems like there should be images available to illustrate this. Has commons been checked? --LauraHale (talk) 03:06, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Comment

 * *Comment: Even though I am not the GA Reviewer, I agree with the above overall assessment of this article. Shearonink (talk) 03:26, 20 April 2012 (UTC)