Talk:Hoteling

Tone
The tone of the "considerations" section is not properly encyclopedic for Wikipedia. Reads more like a promo or a how-to. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:42, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * in hoteling industry customer is not always right because noe a days all pracautions are taken for the clear satisfaction of customes. USSAMA RASHEEd  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.177.50.140 (talk) 17:44, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Who uses it
The section was looking like self-promotion. The statements about the benefits with specifics for CCRA has nothing to do with who uses it. A very large set of examples can be given. A simple, referenced listing would be more helpful than a single anecdote. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 57.250.229.136 (talk) 16:55, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Addressing long-standing issues
I have been working on this article to address long-standing flags for citation and writing style, and generally to improve the article's coverage of the topic. I work in the industry (for AgilQuest). My intent is to improve the article according to Wikipedia's neutrality standards, not to advance my company's interests in particular. -HeyBoogie (talk) 17:02, 4 August 2015 (UTC)


 * There is some inconsistency in this article between the one-L and two-L spellings. The article title uses two L's ("hotelling") while the first word spells it with just one. I have searched on Google Trends; it seems that both spellings are used rather frequently. (The results are difficult to interpret, though, because of a famous statistician named Harold Hotelling.)
 * Regardless, the article title and the first use of the term in the article should match. I propose (as the easier solution) that we change the title of the article to "Hoteling" and change the spelling throughout to match." Any objections? HeyBoogie (talk) 17:49, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Lead sentence(s)
Thank you for your improvements to the lead sentence. I just made a couple further edits. I thought starting without a jargon reference "hot desking" would be better, but I agree that addressing its relation to this similar concept should be done sooner, so I moved a lower paragraph up. -HeyBoogie (talk) 15:45, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * . Thank you.  I can see that another edit as now been made the result of which is that the second-line in the article now contains "is similar to X, and is sometimes confused with it since both methods support unassigned Y."  I don't think this latest wording is likely to help our readers understand the topic or give them the kind of immediate high-level overview that we try to provide with a WP:LEAD.  Would you be willing to consider a self-revert to the changes in the first paragraph?  —Sladen (talk) 17:05, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * You're right, my version is not so great either. Instead of reverting, I have adjusted the lead paragraph again -- I think (hope) this addresses both your points and ours. Feel free to revert or edit as you see fit, I have the article on my watchlist and will see any edits you make. -HeyBoogie (talk) 18:37, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hoteling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151011090037/http://www.workforce.com/articles/21072-office-hoteling-some-companies-offer-reservations-but-some-workers-have-reservations to http://www.workforce.com/articles/21072-office-hoteling-some-companies-offer-reservations-but-some-workers-have-reservations

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:30, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hoteling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151125123408/http://www.fiercemobilegovernment.com/story/mobility-central-femas-mission-deputy-cao-says/2013-05-14 to http://www.fiercemobilegovernment.com/story/mobility-central-femas-mission-deputy-cao-says/2013-05-14

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:52, 17 September 2017 (UTC)