Talk:House of Cards season 3/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator:

Reviewer: Czar (talk · contribs) 12:15, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

This article, as nominated, does not meet Good article criteria on breadth. For a major, widely reviewed series, the article neither cites nor summarizes the wide critical response it had. For having previously nominated House of Cards (season 2), I know you're familiar with the sources in its Critical reception section, many of whom returned with reviews for the next season. The baseline for television season articles have only increased since that nomination 10 years ago, so their absence here is a glaring omission. These critical reviews contain both analysis of the show and other details, both of which are needed for basic breadth, such as NYT, EW. I'm quite surprised to see this nominated without those addressed. Entertainment Weekly also has numerous articles on the development of season three. Hollywood Reporter has articles on individual episodes. There's also more that can be said about nearly every section of the article, such as that it was a top contender (by nomination count) in the SAG awards. Since it would take a rewrite to address this content gap (including an expansion of the lede, which does not adequately summarize the article's content) and thus is a long way from satisifying the breadth criteron, I am marking the article as a quickfail. czar 12:15, 24 March 2024 (UTC)