Talk:House of Commons Disqualification Act 1975

primarysources
I'm removing the primarysources tag. This act is uncommonly to the point. It doesn't require much by way of interpretation (and zero legal knowledge) to read the list of disqualified people and see it verifies the article.

Our policy: Primary sources that have been reliably published ... may be used in Wikipedia, but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them. ... Without a secondary source, a primary source may be used only to make descriptive claims, the accuracy of which is verifiable by a reasonable, educated person without specialist knowledge.

This use of primary material seems totally in compliance with the policy.Bazj (talk) 17:32, 19 April 2009 (UTC)