Talk:House v. Napolitano

Untitled
Needs rephrasing: "and that information regarding the chain of custody and whether or not information was copied from his devices." --Jethrogb (talk) 23:01, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

The Arguments section could use more WP:Links--Jethrogb (talk)

Use past tense. From the checklist: '' Correct grammar, verb tenses, and spelling? [Common mistake: multiple verb tenses throughout article. Most of the topics of these articles describe past events, so use past tense consistently throughout. "The plaintiff argued...The defendant responded...The court decided..." NOT The Plaintif argues...The defendant responds...The court decides..."]'' --Jethrogb (talk) 23:01, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

The page is currently an WP:Orphan, I will try to find some pages that can link here, but you should do the same. --Jethrogb (talk) 23:01, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Also, you didn't move over the page but copied the content, so the revision history got lost --Jethrogb (talk) 23:51, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

For the DYK nomination, any suggestions on which fact from your page would be good for "Did you know ..."? --Jethrogb (talk) 00:05, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the editing and all the feedback; I'll get to work on it once my work schedule lightens up a bit. I've talked with professor and am intending to expand the "Settlement" section as he feels it is the most important aspect of the case. Keien Ohta (talk) 08:34, 11 March 2014 (UTC)