Talk:House v The King

Question
If this case has the "second highest number of citations among High Court cases", shouldn't this article be longer? A case with such a high number of citations must surely be quite important. Looking at the articles within Category:GA-Class Australian law articles, the articles there are quite a bit longer and don't consist of such a high proportion of quotes. Idk if I will review this GAN. I'm not an expert in this subject matter. These are just the things I could see as a non-expert in Australian law. Steelkamp (talk) 08:42, 12 August 2023 (UTC)


 * I generally aim to keep entries as concise as possible, while covering all the important aspects
 * I don't think there's necessarily any relationship between a case's number of citations and the length required to explain it as a subject encyclopedic-ally. Some cases, of which this is an example, are only known for small extracts of principle; and aren't really discussed in any other context
 * Happy to hear alternative views Jack4576 (talk) 09:02, 12 August 2023 (UTC)