Talk:How Could Hell Be Any Worse?

2008 comment
The 2004 edition is just a remaster of 80-85' and NOT a remaster of the original album. Also the .nfo from the 1990 rip doesn't tag the tracks 'bad religion', 'slaves', and 'drastic actions' with their version number, whereas the 2004 .nfo does. I removed a line on the main article that alluded to this, as if there may have been a difference between the two releases. 2004 Track list information o this article should really be moved to 80-85' since it's not a remaster of the original 1982 album. But i won't touch that.

2004 edition
Shouldn't the track list for the 2004 edition of the album be put up, like in a new section after the original 14 tracks. Sure its the same as 80-85 but I was just thinking it should be here as well instead of having to jump around pages. --Riskbreaker87 00:14, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

can this be verified "Many later punk groups such as Death by Stereo cite this album as their main influence"? Quazywabbit 23:54, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:BadReligionHowCouldHellBeAnyWorse.jpg
Image:BadReligionHowCouldHellBeAnyWorse.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:26, 1 June 2007 (UTC)