Talk:How to Start Your Own Country (book)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Premeditated Chaos (talk · contribs) 20:17, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Dibsing. Ping if I don't get to this within a week. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 20:17, 7 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Might be worth having some context about Strauss in the lead, if it's possible to cram it in in a small way (is he himself a micronationalist, is he a libertarian philosopher, is he just a random guy, etc)
 * How does it look now?
 * Looks good


 * You say "first" twice in the last sentence of the lead, I think you could reword around it (and again later)
 * Reworded.


 * Lead is a little scant
 * Expanded.
 * As a note, I put in a bit about critical reception because the lead should sum up the whole article.


 * "noted libertarian" reads oddly - try substituting "noted vegetarian" or "noted cross-fitter". It slightly over-eggs the pudding (not just x but a noted x!) but doesn't really add much. "known for his libertarian views" or "libertarian thinker" maybe?
 * I hope "with libertarian views, …" is alright. I originally chose "noted libertarian" because I wanted to distinguish Struass from a libertarian politician!
 * Gotcha, yeah, that's what I was trying with my versions. Yours is also perfectly fine :)


 * The first paragraph gives us one sentence on Strauss and then zips over to defining micronations. It's slightly confusing. I might separate the sentences "Micronations are..." and "They are classified..." into their own paragraph that opens the section, then get into Strauss and his thinking - "Erwin S. Strauss is an American science fiction author and libertarian thinker who became interested in micronations because of blah blah. Interested in individual freedom..."
 * Reorganised. I hope it looks alright now.
 * Yup


 * "Russel McDougall writes..." a) who? b) this isn't really background, it's analysis
 * Reworded.


 * I tweaked the sentence about the research institute to give context, and remove some redundant phrasing
 * Thanks; I really like it!


 * I'm not sure the details about it having a preface and an index are necessary; I don't see them in other book FAs, but I won't force you to remove them if you prefer to keep them.
 * I removed the preface mention. IMO as several books I have read do not contain indexes I thought it was noteworthy in this case. I rarely read literature though so I am not really sure on this.
 * I think both indexes and introductions are so common as to not merit mention unless RS are highlighting them as somehow unusual. But as I said, I won't fight you on it.


 * "The second approach is done by registering a flag of convenience and declaring the ship as sovereign" - if you don't know that flags of convenience is a maritime concept, this makes no sense. Even if you do know, it could use a revision to make it clear it applies to micronations on ships and stuff - try "For micronations based on vessels, a second approach involves registering a flag of convenience but declaring the ship as sovereign", maybe? (I don't think this approach works for land-based ones, does it? Correct me if I'm wrong).
 * Implemented. Yes, you are right!


 * Is "vonu" a real word or one that Strauss invented? If it's real, can we link to wiktionary? If fake, can we specify?
 * According to the book itself it was coined by the "vonuist" libertarian organisation Free Isles in the 1960s. Aside from sources published by the group itself I cannot find any outside usage of vonu yet, so not sure if it is noteworthy enough for Wiktionary (but I'll keep looking).
 * I had a look but couldn't find anything either :( On re-read, I would maybe suggest trimming "vonu" entirely so as to avoid the having to define it in-text, as the definition of it is repetitive with the description of it. What about something like: "The fourth approach involves residing in a secluded area and avoiding interaction with authorities, without formally seceding or declaring independence."


 * "avoiding unnecessary hostility to avoid persecution" duplicate word in same sentence
 * Fixed.

As always, I'm open to discussion about the above points, and any suggested phrasings are just suggestions. Other than that, the article is reasonably well-developed - a little on the shorter side but it seems the sourcing has been reasonably exhausted (Just to cover bases - did you check TWL?). Cover photo is correctly NFCC, no other images. No CV or close para, no Earwig issues. Spot checks of sources I could access did not uncover any issues. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the review! I have replied to all your comments. Sorry for the wait; as you know I have a FAC which is rather time-consuming. I did check TWL which is how I found the newspaper sources (on newspapers.com); unfortunately there does not appear to be a lot of coverage of this work.  ツ LunaEatsTuna  (💬)— 04:21, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * No worries, you know I have to ask :) I've left comments above. A few things need responded to, but otherwise this is pretty much there. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 15:38, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I appreciate your edits and suggestions! Should be alright now :)  ツ LunaEatsTuna  (💬)— 17:40, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Looks good, we're a pass! Great work in this area. I say this a lot, but I wonder if you could get a GT? You could do List of books about micronationalism or something for your top-level article. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 17:50, 16 July 2023 (UTC)