Talk:How to Survive a Plague

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on How to Survive a Plague. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120923222649/http://gawker.com/5945317/how-to-survive-a-plague-how-to-make-an-uplifting-documentary-about-aids to http://gawker.com/5945317/how-to-survive-a-plague-how-to-make-an-uplifting-documentary-about-aids

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:33, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Article Evaluation:
- Article Evaluated: How to Survive a Plague

After reading the article, How to Survive a Plague, I have come to the conclusion that the article seems to be rather vague. The article is nothing more than a movie summary, though the summary is detailed and gives a good synopsis of the movie it could have been more detailed, and had more background information that helped give facts behind what sparked the creation of the movie. Everything that is included in the article is relevant, there just could be more information. The article in itself is a bit of a distraction, simply becasue of the set up of the page and the various brightly colored font that is randomly included, other than that the page is very straight foward and brief. The information that is presented is accurate and current/relevant to today. Due to the movie being relativly new, everything seems to be up to date and the information flows in a logical, and chronological way. The author of the article did a very good job at remaining neutral on the topic and only presenting information that was relevant to the movie and the movie topic. There was no bias and the information was very straight foward and to the point. Outside of the information presented in the article, everything is excellent. All of the links work and are very insightful/helpful to understadning the article as a whole. The source links are credible and backed up with facts; in addition to that, there are many references, all relveant to the article, the movie, and the topic of the movie. Overall, I enjoyed the article, and I also like the fact that the article is apart of a Wikiproject. The information was clear and to the point and is on an intresting topic, the article kept me engaed and is very relevant to today, which makes the article relatable.

NiaSavon (talk) 20:41, 6 September 2018 (UTC) NiaSavon

Nice job.Cassell04 (talk) 23:50, 9 September 2018 (UTC)