Talk:Howard DGA-15

Alot of the information is duplicated elsewhere. For example there is no need to talk about Mr Mulligan here as there is a Mr Mulligan section. Same with the DGA-11. Moving relevant text to right articles.--Abaddon 15:30, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Point one: If you feel there is conflict of interest, so be it - but Howard owners do not need to "sell" their airplanes. Time after time, I have heard of the planes selling themselves!

Point two: It is useless to speak of any of the production Howards without pointing out their racing heritage; If you think eliminating verbage and replacing it with a lot of cross-references "improves" wikipedia, -- yeah, right... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nuance 4 (talk • contribs) 19:43, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

conflict & duplication
Point one: If you feel there is conflict of interest, so be it - but Howard owners do not need to "sell" their airplanes. Time after time, I have heard of the planes selling themselves!

Point two: It is useless to speak of any of the production Howards without pointing out their racing heritage; If you think eliminating verbage and replacing it with a lot of cross-references "improves" wikipedia, -- yeah, right... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nuance 4 (talk • contribs) 19:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

conflict resolution
I have tried to remove the hyperbolae and slanging matches from this article whilst stillretaining the pertinent bits. I believe the tags can be removed now, so I shall do that. If any body objects, open a discussion or revert it (re-instating the tags)Petebutt (talk) 02:30, 26 November 2009 (UTC)