Talk:Howard Eliott Payne

Untitled
Can anyone else notice that this article is based on someones original research and is totally unencyclopedic, i have downsized the article to make it look a bit more appropriate for an encyclopedia. This article does not appear to be notable on wikipedia. Its uncited, far too detailed, peacocky and riddled with POVPhilOak (talk) 00:16, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree. Henry O&#39;Halloran (talk) 08:31, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

In terms of notability this guy doesn't even have any information on Allmusic.com. The Stands were clearly a shortlived band active for 2 years, why has the former singer been allowed to occupy more space on wiki than people such as Ian Broudie, Tim Wheeler, Simon Fowler etc. I'll be nominating it for deletion if this continues.PhilOak (talk) 22:28, 17 November 2009 (UTC)


 * The article quality is no indication of the subject's notability. It was/is badly written and almost read like a press release, but as recording artists go, he's notable enough for a wiki entry.  You should think about expanding the articles of the aforementioned britpoppers if you feel they deserve longer articles. Petepetepetepete (talk) 07:12, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * As PhilOak said, the article was full of forced NPOV-vio garbage, and was correctly reduced. Henry O&#39;Halloran (talk) 16:23, 18 November 2009 (UTC)