Talk:Howard Schultz

Strange structure of the article
There is currently a notice that it reads like an advertisement. I am not sure if it is or not, but at the least I concur that the article seems strange. It instantly jumps to Starbucks from the get go, but I think this should be at a LATER point; first introduce the person briefly. Don't open with such a huge jump-to, in particular right at 2008. The structure seems sooooo weird ... why is 2008 such an important part of this wikipedia article? Who wrote it? How did it look before that? My recommendation is to make the intro much shorter; and if relevant parts are to be retained, then put them into subparts that are, ideally, as objective and neutral as possible. Mentioning facts is ok, but they should be arranged as if someone NEUTRAL wrote them. Right now this article is simply weird ... I am not even sure if it is an advertisement, but the structure of it is very unusual. It would be best if wikipedia could have a general format for all people, e. g. not make the intro too long for one part. 2A02:8388:1604:F600:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F (talk) 17:42, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Yes, agreed. This looks like S's PR folks have written most of the text. Most political scientists and commentators would agree that S has the charisma of a white bread loaf paired with the political judgement of a five-days-old venti latte. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.18.241.119 (talk) 11:56, 11 November 2021 (UTC)