Talk:Howden Dyke Island

I agree completely and without hesitation: this article should be deleted speedily, expeditedtly, and post-haste. --Teemu Leisti (talk) 21:49, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedy deleted as lacking sufficient context to identify its subject, because... (your reason here)

YES PLEASE DELETE IT BECAUSE IT'S NOT REALLY USEFUL, AND TO BE COMPLETELY TRUTHFUL, I ADDED IT WHILE DRUNK, JUST AS I HAVE DONE A COUPLE OF TIMES IN RECENT YEARS, THOUHG WHEN SOBER, I TEND TO MAKE EDITS THAT ARE IN MY HUMBLE OPINION QUITE USEFUL, THOUGH NOT IN THIS CASE, SO PLEASE DO WITH IT AS YOU PLEASE, KIND SIR (i don't get drunk that often, i'm not an alcoholic, please trust me sir on this (i'm a useful member of society gainfully employed, really, no kidding, just the facts)) --Teemu Leisti (talk) 21:57, 12 September 2012 (UTC)


 * I actually think that this feature may well be notable. There are certainly more references and points of interest than many other articles I've seen that have been allowed to remain. I like a challenge, anyway. And it fits the criteria to remain, I think. --Chronotopian (talk) 13:18, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

HOWDEN DYKE ISLAND COMPLETELY ROCKS
i PLAN TO RETIRE ON hOWDEN dYKE iSLAND --Teemu Leisti (talk) 21:59, 12 September 2012 (UTC)