Talk:Hubert Pierlot/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 18:47, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * No copyvios detected.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 17:59, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Didn't find any problems with the prose.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * MOS followed.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * Citation and reference sections are detailed and well-formatted.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:
 * Adequate citations to reliable sources. I cannot access the sources right now, so I'm accepting them AGF.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * C. No original research:
 * All content and analysis is verifiable.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * Stays focused on major aspects.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * B. Focused:
 * Remains focused on the subject.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Fair, neutral presentation, all analysis is attributed to reliable sources.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * No edit warring or other disruptions since this article was created in 2006.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 17:59, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * All images are licensed for public domain or under Creative Commons.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 17:59, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * Images are highly informative, with appropriate captions.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 17:59, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall: A very good article, should be ready for the FAC process.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Pass or Fail: