Talk:Hud (1963 film)

Move

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved to Hud (1963 film). Fuhghettaboutit make a point worth keeping in mind for the future, though. Jenks24 (talk) 12:05, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Move to distinguish from Hud (1986 film) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk • contribs) 21:30, 14 September 2015


 * Support WP:NCF ambiguous disambiguation should not be used WP:PRECISE ; the current title should point to the dab page per WP:NCF -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 05:50, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Support In ictu oculi (talk) 06:26, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy per WP:NCF  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 06:51, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Sort of, waffling, supportish support. Given the current name of the other film article, supporting is obvious—and to be clear I am actually supporting at this time. However, it may be that the other film article should be moved to Vilde, the Wild One and if that ever occurs (it is not straightforward, e.g., searches are very skewed by Wikipedia's use of the title), then this should be at Hud (film), with a hatnote saying something like For the Norwegian film originally named Hud, see...--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:14, 23 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Alma is middle-aged?
Patricia Neal was 35 when Hud was shot. But here her character is described as "middle-aged". "Middle age" is generally understood to begin in the 40s, and is defined by Miriam-Webster as starting at age 45. Does Neal specifically play an older character, or are we defining "middle-age" down for women?


 * The bibliography used in the article defined the character as a middle-aged woman. The description may have to do with the fact that Alma was in her middle thirties and divorced. Nowadays that does clearly not indicate anything, but I guess that by the standards of the early 1960s society, she was maybe seen as middle-aged. Let's not forget that it was made clear throughout the film she had a turbulent relationship with her previous husband and a few years had gone by in-between that time and she working for the Bannon family.


 * Aside from whatever took anybody to say she was middle-aged, or to define whether she may or may not have been considered at the time so, I just erased the word from the article. I don't think there's too much need to look into that anyway. It may have been the opinion of the writer. Or it could just be that in the book "Halmea" was maybe older?


 * It should be mentioned by the way that Ravetch and Frank Jr. were really progressive writers for their time, and in my opinion did not intend to portray Alma in that light anyway. You can read their feelings about the character here.-- GD uwen  Tell me!  19:02, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Essay-like plot
I have restored an old version of the article since it was again written to contain essay-like phrases or personal opinions. We've been through this before and it was clarified in the first Good Article Nomination that it should be avoided. Forget not No original research.-- GD uwen  Tell me!  21:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)