Talk:Hue–Da Nang Campaign/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 20:27, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: one found and fixed. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:34, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:34, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Well written and organized. I made a number of minor copy-edits.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * I formatted one citation (ref#1); assume good faith for all off-line sources.
 * I removed the EL, as per WP:EL, as it is already used as ref#1
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Sufficeinet detail and focus.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * NPOV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Suitable captions and rationales for non-free use.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * An excellent article. I am happy to list this as a good article. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:56, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for assessing the article.Canpark (talk) 07:51, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for assessing the article.Canpark (talk) 07:51, 2 March 2011 (UTC)