Talk:Hugo Barrera Saldaña

Paid editing
This is a clear case of paid editing, and this draft should not be accepted unless the creator,, makes a disclosure statement that complies with Wikipedia's Terms of Use. Looie496 (talk) 01:19, 8 October 2017 (UTC)


 * But this is not a case of paid editing. It is an article about a noted researcher in the city that I live in, and I wanted to create an article on something new. Is there a way for me to demonstrate that I wasn't paid to write this article? What does it look like it is a paid edition? I took another Wikipedia entry on a researcher as a template. I could edit the article if there is something that makes it look like it is a paid edition, but I need to know what's wrong. DATrevino (talk) 05:26, 8 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The primary thing that makes it look like paid editing is that your account was created specifically for the purpose of writing this article, even though you are clearly an experienced editor. Looie496 (talk) 13:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Well, thanks for the compliment. This is really my first article. I do edits on the Spanish Wikipedia once in a while (Spanish is my first language), but you don't need to create an account there. I intend to keep on creating articles in english, but this took me days of research and I have a job so I don't have that much free time. I did create the account the same day that I uploaded the draft, but I was working on it on Google Docs, thinking that I wouldn't need an account, pretty much as in Spanish Wikipedia. Maybe it looks like I'm an experienced editor because I'm used to scientific/technical writing, but this is my first article on Wikipedia. DATrevino (talk) 20:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC)