Talk:Hugo Dittberner

Contested deletion
This article should be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because an anonymous wiki contributor says so... (your reason here) --Charles01 (talk) 17:07, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

I am in the middle of translating it from German wikipedia as you would have known if you had taken ten seconds to look.

Nominating an entry for speedy deletion within a few minutes of its commencement may be an effective way to reduce the time that people will devote to wikipedia, but seems unlikely to cure the mental issues  of those that indulge in it.

I wish you a speedy recovery.

Regards

Charles01 (talk) 17:07, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I understand your frustration, but a hostile message like this doesn't help much either. To avoid an article being nominated for (speedy) deletion, it is better to work on it first in your sandbox and only when it has at least some sourcing establishing notability move it into main article space. Alternatively (even better), start with the sourcing... Happy editing! --Randykitty (talk) 16:33, 16 September 2014 (UTC)