Talk:Hull Victoria Pier railway station

Name -no railway line
Can this "idiocy" be avoided where the place has to be named "railway station" because a railway company owned it. And the tying words in knots whilst the article has to explain that the thing doesn't have any railway lines. eg " It was not a railway station at all, just a ticket office ..." - this can be avoided.

I was an official destination on railway company timetables. That isn't a reason to start using a confusing title. It appears on timetables/tickets as "Hull Victoria Pier" etc not "Hull Victoria Pier railway station".

Is there a better title for this, Victoria Pier ferry terminal is one option?

Prof.Haddock (talk) 21:53, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Please would you hold off moving railway station pages without discussing the moves first? We do have some established conventions, and it would be appreciated if these conventions were maintained. -- Red rose64 (talk) 22:53, 21 June 2014 (UTC)