Talk:Human After All/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: BeatlesLedTV (talk · contribs) 00:09, 4 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi Philroc! I'd be happy to review this. I myself created List of songs recorded by Daft Punk and brought it to featured status, so I'm a bit of a Daft Punk fan you can say. I'll have my review done by tonight. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 00:09, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Lead and infobox

 * Ref 1 isn't needed in the infobox
 * Change the studio to Daft House, add a break, then put Paris, France in small font (See Homework and Discovery and you'll know what I mean
 * I think mentioning the album's six-week creation would be appropriate.
 * As opposed to "with this album," I would compare it to Homework and Discovery a little bit, kind of like how the Discovery lead compares it to Homework
 * Second paragraph looks good

Background and structure

 * Some sentences where quotation marks are inside punctuation while others are outside. Choose one or the other for consistency
 * Not sure if the first sentence is appropriate to start a "background" section. Think it'd be better to start the third paragraph
 * Was it recorded in two weeks or six weeks? I've read multiple sources that say six weeks, which is also consistent with the recording dates "September – November" in the infobox
 * Add the year after Daft Punk's Electroma – (2006)
 * Concert tours do not go in italics (Alive 2006/2007)

Release and promotion

 * Ref 13 and 24 are the exact same.
 * Again, un-italicize the Alive 2006/2007 tour
 * Separate chart performances into their own 'commercial performance' section. Also add the other chart positions of the album, especially the number one Top Dance/Electronic chart
 * I would add the info in the second paragraph to 'critical reception' after all the reviews; it basically discusses the response to reception before actual reception. (This whole section can be condensed to two paragraphs)
 * Add AllMusic refs for the last sentence (for Musique Vol. 1 and Alive 2007)

Critical reception

 * Again, some sentences have quotation marks inside punctuation while others are outside. Make sure it's consistent
 * Add who won the Grammy award that year

Track listing

 * Looks good

Personnel

 * Make sure to cite the liner notes; section is currently unsourced
 * Link the artists if they have pages. Can also link things such as drum machines, synthesizers, and vocoders.
 * Make the items mentioned above plural, as I'm sure the duo used multiple instruments to record the album (unless the liner notes themselves state otherwise)

Remix album

 * Add publish date to ref 40 (18 June 2014)
 * Rest looks good

Charts

 * This section should only be reserved for the actual chart listings. Moved the sales figures to 'release and promotion'.
 * With the sales figures – "as of May 2013," seems kinda outdated. Think we could update these figures, especially since it's now February 2019?

Certifications

 * Make sure refs have access dates

Final comments

 * Overall looks good. It definitely has potential to become a GA once these issues are resolved. I'm here to help as well, so don't be afraid to ask! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 01:25, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for stepping in and reviewing this article so shortly after its nomination. I have managed to fix most of the issues you found; however, there don't seem to be any publicly-available sales figures for Human After All beyond 2013. (I encountered an edit conflict when saving, and I may have reverted other user's edits; I apologize and have attempted to remerge.) Phil  roc  (c) 16:11, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Damn that's a shame. I think it's starting to look good to become a GA, just gonna give it a final read-through and make any small edits then I'll give it a pass! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 17:07, 5 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Looks good. I will ✅ this. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 17:13, 5 February 2019 (UTC)