Talk:Human behavior/Archive 1

Comment
I submit this edit to help the writer understand and define human behavior, (Children) behavior is measured in Sociology as having no meaning, being not directed at others and thus is the most basic human action.

Vocabulary Words:

Attitudes Emotions Values Authority Rapport Persuasion

With children in a learning environment many actions are at their behavior because it is where they put their actions. I suggest we demonstrate the importance of recognizing behavior, with (COMMON);(SOME UNUSUAL);(SOME ACCEPTABLE); (SOME OUTSIDE ACCEPTABLE LIMITS) when teaching are children.

I would share that the article state the behavior of people is studied by the academic disciplines of psychology, sociology, economics, anthropology. However the endeavor of teaching must see the relevance of the behavior, in a learning setting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.122.8.1 (talk) 16:21, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Human Behavior
What is common behavior is important, defined usual adolascent behavior, although spoken as disruptive in a learning setting. Remember the children will commend themselves with the action of behavior at an undisclosed motivation and intent. We as faculty or teachers must measure with reasonable control to help the child actions/behavior acceptable in the learning setting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.122.8.1 (talk) 16:43, 19 October 2007 (UTC) From debasis_62@hotmail.com The burden of Emotion has a direct link to "resources are scarce & and many users" The concept of stretch of Prahlad et al can work in settings of industries but results in increasing the burden of sacrifice in parents,accommodate their longings to requirements of adolescents,and subsequent generation of frustration in both the classes. The burden of aging diseases,social requirements. availability of gadgets. fast outdated gadgets, info of technology,terrorism,social criminals & coverage in press and its fear. the increasing exposure to latest development in info tech,eagerness to prove sexually,financially,peer pressure,its all getting into a maze in psychology of development. However I am into Motivation of manpower involved in Health sector and treating Geriatrics group ie Doctor patient relationship" have little input in behavior of child, adolescent,groups,adults & Aged patients.Its an open topic for development of new scales of measurements distinct from the older methods.The topic is ripe for newer inputs by social psychologist to lok into. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.72.49.238 (talk) 13:03, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

I recommend this topic become a subset of psychology or expanded to include all forms of human behavior. Behavior is physical, chemical and human...some say it is only the first two (emperical science), but most of the world believes human behavior is more than just physical and chemical, and it's here that can be described —Preceding unsigned comment added by S3Advantage (talk • contribs) 11:30, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Merge Proposal
It seems like this article says nothing new -- I recommend either a templated subpage explaining where we are going with it, or a deletion. It seems that this should redirect to Behavior...Josh.Pritchard.DBA (talk) 03:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

I agree, though what I say apparently means nothing on this website. Selective.yellow (talk) 09:06, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

I agree with the merge. --Jcbutler (talk) 18:42, 25 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't see why the word 'behaviour' should be treated as 'human behaviour'. I'm not really sure what the 'behaviour' article is supposed to be about, given that behaviour generally means animal behaviour, and humans fall under that category. I don't like the idea of 'human behaviour' redirecting to 'behaviour' though. If you want an idea of what a good article on this topic might look like, see e.g. here. Richard001 (talk) 03:55, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Changed title back to behavior
The recent move to "Human behaviour" was a violation of WP:ENGVAR, since the first major content contributor to this article titled it with the US spelling. Please do not change the title again. II | (t - c) 03:44, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

ALREGRAIC
$$Insert formula here$$ this info sucks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.54.132.70 (talk) 01:09, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Add Human ethology.
Add Human ethology. How is this not Tendentious editing on your part User:Arthur Rubin? 99.19.40.44 (talk) 19:48, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * How is this relevant, unless the articles should be the same? Perhaps human behavior should redirect to human ethology?  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 09:49, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Maybe, but until then ... 99.190.81.210 (talk) 22:11, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, we'll do it that way. — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 23:33, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Done, for now ...  99.181.142.47 (talk) 01:47, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Does anyone have any sources to suggest?
I see some recent editorial work on this article. Does anyone watching this page have suggestions for current sources for improving it? -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 21:18, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Human behavior. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100130233229/http://www.americanhumanist.org/who_we_are/about_humanism/What_is_Humanism to http://www.americanhumanist.org/who_we_are/about_humanism/What_is_Humanism

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:02, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Request section on "Territorial behaviour" to be created.
I have been searching Wikipedia in vain for an article or article sub-section on human territorial behaviour. The closest thing to it that I've been able to find is Territoriality_(nonverbal_communication) although that article seem to be entirely focused on behaviours related to fysical space and geographical areas.. Whereas what I was looking for was something more generally about the whole set of human territorial behaviours, of how people and groups are claiming and defending domination not only of fysical space and land area, but also behaviours aimed at dominating more abstract entities such as for example a forum discussion, or a field of expertise, or an area of morality, or of popular fashion in some area.. - I do not consider myself an expert on this topic but I would like it to be created either as a sub-section under human behaviour, or as a stand-alone article. Are there any qualified experts on (especially human) territorial behaviour, who would? --RP Nielsen (talk) 00:25, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Evaluation for Psych 101
I would update this article. It seems too outdated on it's information. --Kelsey.bayerl (talk) 00:20, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Kelsey.Bayerl