Talk:Human development theory

Untitled
1. "Human development theory" is too vague to e limited to the content of the article. There is NO necessary connection to ecology or "green" anything.

2. No real suggestions as to who might use this terminology are made...  Who is using this language to talk about anything? One mention of Amartya Sen does NOT a general article make.

3. Please check the Human_development disambiguation page to see what is already being done with this concept. "Human development theory" is ALREADY an established discipline with numerous theories, see in particular those under psychology.

4. The subject matter proposed seems to be what is discussed under Human development (humanity) and more likely to be a part of what is called "International Development" (see the move to merge in that direction.)

Please, clean this up and subsume it into proper articles already part of Wikipedia. Thanks, Emyth (talk) 13:34, 16 February 2010 (UTC)