Talk:Human metapneumovirus

Modulation of immune response
10.1128/CMR.00081-15 JFW &#124; T@lk  08:36, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Excessive cites
The 'Epidemiology' section has some pretty massive overciting. While there's nothing wrong with that, I know that it is generally discouraged. Can someone with expertise in these matters either expand the section to spread out what each specific ref is citing, or trim them down to the most relevant cites? I have zero expertise in these disciplines, so I can't make an informed judgement as to what is most relevant. Anastrophe (talk) 22:42, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Post Covid respiratory response to to this virus
Post Covid patients respiratory response and length of illness to this virus seems much more severe than to those never infected with Covid 2600:6C40:1300:5BE1:564:19E8:99C4:27D1 (talk) 01:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Source? Citation? Anything more than just a random claim? Anastrophe (talk) 03:20, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Can we justify a "this article has at least one issue?"
Afaik, Wikipedia does not speak in terms of first person pronouns. Several sections have "We ..." passages. I am in to place to correct this myself. Ellenor2000 (talk) 22:18, 3 June 2023 (UTC)


 * If you're willing, yes please. They're probably the result of just broad copying from the original papers without rewording. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 04:14, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Vacillation between "hMPV" and "HMPV"
The article should stick to one or the other in my opinion. I don't know which one is the 'official' designation. There are 59 iterations of the character string in the article (including in refs). 25 are "HMPV", 34 are "hMPV". cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 03:33, 18 June 2023 (UTC)